Radon Guard Brochure
Radon Guard Installation Instructions
Radon Guard Specifications
Radon Guard Evaluation Report
Introducing Foam-Control Radon Guard,
We are pleased to announce Foam-Control Radon Guard as a new member of the Foam-Control product family. Building codes are now requiring radon gas mitigation and RADON GUARD does this and more! – it’s structural, vents sub slab gases and insulates all in one product.
We have developed the following literature to support the introduction of Foam-Control Radon Guard:
- Foam-Control Radon Guard Sales Literature
- Foam-Control Radon Guard Installation Instructions
- Foam-Control Radon Guard Specification
In addition, Foam-Control Radon Guard is recognized in a new UL Evaluation Report UL ER11812-06 as a code compliance product for radon gas mitigation. The new literature and support materials are available on the NEW website that supports Foam-Control Radon Guard – http://www.radon-guard.com. The Radon Guard website also includes an introductory video on Radon Guard and a detailed installation video.
Updated Foam-Control Code Reports
We are pleased to announce the release of an update to the Foam-Control Code Evaluation Report UL ER 11812-01 covering Foam-Control EPS Products. A new Table 3 has been added which provides the potential heat of Foam-Control products. The potential heat is a value needed to show compliance of certain wall assemblies to the International Building Code (IBC).
Determining Minimum R-Value on Tapered Insulation Systems.
New Roofing Technical Bulletin No. 3018 – Determining Minimum R-Value on Tapered Insulation Systems.
We are pleased to announce Foam-Control EPS Technical Bulletin Roofing No. 3018 is now available. The bulletin provides information on the minimum thickness of Foam-Control EPS when part of tapered roof insulation.
In general, the thickness of roof insulation must meet minimum prescriptive R-values at 4 ft. from drain locations when insulation is tapered ¼ in. per foot.
California Prop 65 and Foam-Control EPS
The California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, better known as Proposition 65, requires any business whose product can expose consumers in California to a chemical the state has determined as “known to cause cancer” to label their products with a warning about potential exposure. Proposition 65 requires the California EPA’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) to maintain and update a list of chemicals known to the state to cause cancer. On April 22, 2016 OEHHA announced styrene would be listed as known to the state of California to cause cancer. This announcement was accompanied by a proposal to establish a no significant risk level (NSRL) for styrene exposure at 27μg/person/day.
This has enabled the EPS Industry Alliance to conduct finite analysis that verifies exposure from residual styrene in expanded polystyrene products are significantly below the proposed NSRL. As a result of work completed by EPS-IA, the majority of expanded polystyrene foam applications used by consumers will not require labeling under California Proposition 65.
Please see attached document from EPS-IA that provides complete details. The document is also available on the Foam-Control website at http://www.foam-control.com/library/literature/literature-epsia
Comparing Polyiso and Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) from the past to today
We are pleased to announce Foam-Control EPS Technical Bulletin Roofing No. 3017 is now available. The bulletin compares the performance of polyiso and EPS from the past to today.
A school building located in Minnesota was recently undergoing a roofing system replacement and it provided the perfect opportunity to evaluate the performance of the existing roof insulations. The school was originally built in 1999 and consisted of a combination of polyiso and EPS roof insulation. Samples of both products were removed from the roof and evaluated for R-value at various temperatures.
Testing demonstrated the vastly different temperature dependence between polyiso and EPS. A plot of the R-value for the 17 year old polyiso and new polyiso demonstrates the dramatic change in polyiso insulation in recent years. “New” polyiso loses significant R-value at cold temperatures.
In comparison, the R-value for 17 year old EPS and new EPS are similar. This demonstrates that EPS can be trusted to have stable R-value performance.
It is very important to understand that the latest generation of polyiso insulations and EPS have very similar R-values when used at cold temperatures. This has dramatic implications when selecting your insulation product and its thickness for use in cold weather and cold storage applications
We are pleased to announce the release of an updated ICC-ES ESR-1006 Foam-Control Code Report. Foam-Control EPS products continue to maintain the highest levels of recognition in in the insulation industry, with evaluation reports available from both ICC-ES and UL.
ASTM D6817 and ASTM C578 Summary Table
We are pleased to announce a new ASTM D6817 and ASTM C578 Summary Table is now available to demonstrate the primary differences between Foam-Control Geofoam and Foam-Control EPS products.
The key differences between Foam-Control Geofoam and Foam-Control EPS insulation products are:
- Foam-Control Geofoam has requirements for compressive resistance at 1% deformation
- Foam-Control EPS insulation has requirements for compressive resistance at 10% deformation
- Foam-Control EPS insulation has published R-values
We hope you find the new summary table useful to understand the differences between Foam-Control Geofoam and Foam-Control EPS insulations.
The National Roofing Contractors Association (NRCA) has a new article, “Another Round”, published in the February issue of Professional Roofing that provides insight into the performance of Polyiso roof insulations. The article describes the test results from a recent round of testing on Polyiso by NRCA.
NRCA identified that Polyiso has ongoing problems with compliance to the requirements of the Polyiso standard, ASTM C1289 and NRCA has serious concerns over the dimensional tolerances and trueness/flatness of Polyiso.
Most importantly, NRCA “maintains its longstanding recommendation to roof system designers for use of a suitable cover board over faced, rigid board polyisocyanurate insulation”.
We are pleased to announce the availability of two new Foam-Control EPS Technical Bulletins covering the attachment of wall cladding/furring over Foam-Control EPS in accordance with the International Building Code and International Residential Building Code.
The use of continuous insulation is growing and understanding these Foam-Control Technical Bulletins helps to demonstrate attachment methods are available and accepted by the building codes.
We are pleased to announce the availability of an updated Foam-Control Roofing Technical Bulletin No. 3001.
The National Roof Contractors Association (NRCA) has published a new recommendation for the R-value of polyisocyanurate (polyiso) insulation with the publication of updates to the 2015 The NRCA Roofing Manual: Membrane Roof Systems.
The new NRCA recommendation for polyiso R-value is based upon testing by NRCA on current generation polyiso roof insulations.
The new NRCA polyiso R-value recommendation is:
Polyiso R-value = 5.0 per inch thickness in all climate conditions.